Monday, June 15, 2009

DTN News: The Creeping Reach Of Chinese Arms

DTN News: The Creeping Reach Of Chinese Arms
*Sources: Int'l Media / The Malaysian Insider (NSI News Source Info) SINGAPORE - June 15, 2009: Is China returning as a major player in the international arms market? According to data released by the United States Congressional Research Service, Beijing signed arms exports agreements worth US$3.8 billion (RM13.3 billion) in 2007 – its highest sales figures in more than a decade. In recent years, Chinese overseas arms sales have averaged more than US$2 billion a year, considerably higher than during the 1990s, when Beijing averaged less than US$1 billion a year in arms exports. In fact, China has not enjoyed sales this strong since the late ’80s, when it sold to both sides in the Iran-Iraq War. Its overseas arms agreements then approached US$3 billion annually, in today’s dollars.
Volume of Chinese major conventional arms exports to Asia-Pacific recipients, 1981-95 (Recipients listed in rank order; figures are in SIPRI trend indicator values, expressed in US$ millions at constant 1990 prices; totals may not add up exactly due to rounding) Recipient/Year 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 TOTAL Pakistan 140 72 555 177 57 57 370 114 463 494 427 196 574 221 260 4179 Thailand 0 0 0 0 27 2 211 31 173 239 226 534 0 298 298 2039 Bangladesh 8 38 113 6 38 0 0 180 403 95 0 258 0 0 0 1139 North Korea 16 277 29 44 25 198 174 254 6 24 0 24 0 0 0 1069 Myanmar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 169 181 17 358 0 310 1052 Sri Lanka 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 14 0 82 1 11 0 0 112 Cambodia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 20 Laos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 164 387 697 227 147 259 757 581 1077 1041 916 1030 943 519 868 9612 Source: SIPRI arms trade database, March 1996 Note: SIPRI arms transfer data are an index which indicates trends in deliveries of major conventional weapons. SIPRI arms trade statistics do not reflect purchase prices and are not comparable with economic statistics such as national accounts or foreign trade statistics. Sources and methods used in development of SIPRI arms trade figures are explained in the SIPRI Yearbook and in Sources and Methods for SIPRI Research on Military Expenditure, Arms Transfers and Arms Production, SIPRI Fact Sheet, January 1995.* China is now, on average, the world’s fifth-largest arms exporter, after the traditional leaders – the US, Russia, France and the United Kingdom. In fact, in 2007 it was No 4 in terms of arms agreements, overtaking France. Nearly all of China’s arms transfers are to developing countries, and in this arena China has become a formidable competitor. In terms of arms deliveries to the developing world, Beijing was No 3 in 2007. Its largest markets are in Asia, the Middle East and particularly Africa. In fact, from 2004 to 2007, China was the single largest seller of arms to Africa. Its major customers include Pakistan, Egypt, Myanmar, Iran, Zimbabwe and Zambia. TENUOUS STANDING? Nevertheless, China’s current high standing in the global arms marketplace remains tenuous. In the first place, most of China’s biggest arms sales are still to a handful of customers, particularly Pakistan. The 2007 figures were high because they counted a couple of big deals with Pakistan, such as for the JF-17 Thunder fighter jet, which Pakistan is co-producing with the Chinese. It is not certain, therefore, that China will be able to maintain such high levels of arms exports for the next several years. For example, Myanmar used to be a big buyer of Chinese arms, but its purchases have tapered off significantly in recent years. For the most part, China still sells mostly small arms and ancillary equipment, such as trucks, uniforms and tents. The country’s arms industry manufactures some impressive pieces of equipment, such as the C-802 antiship cruise missile (similar to the very effective French Exocet) and the K-8 jet trainer/light attack aircraft, but there have been few sales of these types of equipment lately. On the whole, though, China can offer few advanced weapon systems that are technologically competitive on the global arms market, and its customers still remain basically the poor (African states) and the pariahs (Iran). Moreover, many of China’s arms deals are mostly done at “friendship prices”, which entails selling arms at a discount, either for political purposes (cementing alliances) or, increasingly, to secure links with oil-producing countries. BIG-TICKET SALES For China to remain a leading arms exporter, it needs to come up with more competitive products. One big possibility for future significant overseas sales is China’s new J-10 fighter jet, a cousin to the Israeli Lavi (upon which it is based) and roughly equivalent in capabilities to the US-built F-16C flown by the Singapore Air Force. The J-10 started development in the mid-1980s and finally entered production for the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) about three or four years ago. It is certainly a vast improvement over the 1960s- and 1970s-era Chinese and Soviet fighters that have filled out the PLAAF for decades, although probably not as good as the Su-27 or particularly the Su-30s acquired from Russia. There has in fact been considerable speculation that the Chinese might flood the global arms market with the J-10. This aircraft could be a good buy, as it would probably be offered at cut-rate prices, certainly below the F-16, the Swedish Gripen, and other smaller combat aircraft. Pakistan and especially Iran have been mentioned as prospective buyers. Other marketable products include the C-701 short-range antiship cruise missile (already sold to Iran and, reportedly, the Hezbollah), the FN-6 man-portable surface-to-air missile (exported to Sudan), and the KS-1A surface-to-air missile (sold to Malaysia). That said, most Chinese weapons systems remain an unknown quantity. The J-10, for example, may be a very good aircraft, but its performance and reliability cannot be independently confirmed, and many countries may not wish to take a chance on it. Countries do not necessarily buy the cheapest weapon systems available – capabilities and effectiveness count, especially when it comes to military products. Many countries, given the choice, will still pay a premium price to get a premium product. For example, when Pakistan decided to acquire new submarines, it bought from France, not China, and while it is buying Chinese fighters, it is also purchasing F-16s from the US. Even during the current global economic crisis, many potential buyers will still be hesitant to seriously consider Chinese weaponry more than they might normally, since they may have to live with these weapons for the next 20 to 30 years. Instead, these countries are more likely to delay any big-ticket arms purchases in general, and wait until the economy recovers – like most Asian countries did during the financial crisis in the late 1990s. One product area where the Chinese do have a considerable edge is ballistic missile systems, such as the DF-11 and B-611 short-range ballistic missiles. The DF-11 (also known as the M-11) has been sold to Pakistan, while Turkey has acquired the B-611. Sales of longer-range missile systems, however, are restricted by the Missile Technology Control Regime, which China has agreed to abide by. THE FUTURE OF ARMS SALES China is still extremely constrained when it comes to potential customers, the types of arms they may want to buy, and the types of arms it can sell. This is not to say that Beijing will not increasingly promote its arms on the global market, or that it will not score some coups when it comes to overseas sales. Certainly, expanding arms exports continues to be a key business strategy for Chinese defence firms – as much as it is for almost every arms manufacturer around the world. Given the global overcapacity in armaments production and economic pressures to keep factories open and preserve jobs, everybody wants to get in on the arms-export business. But do not imagine the Chinese will soon be supplanting or joining the US and Western Europe as a large supplier of sophisticated arms. Loading...

No comments:

Post a Comment