Showing posts with label Hamid Karzai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hamid Karzai. Show all posts

Saturday, December 04, 2010

DTN News - BREAKING NEWS: Afghans And Pakistanis Attack Cables - WikiLeaks

DTN News - BREAKING NEWS: Afghans And Pakistanis Attack Cables - WikiLeaks
Source: DTN News - - This article compiled by Roger Smith from reliable sources By ALISSA J. RUBIN and CARLOTTA GALL - NYTimes.com
(NSI News Source Info) KABUL, Afghanistan - December 5, 2010: The Afghan president and the Pakistani prime minister dismissed the WikiLeaks revelations about their respective countries as alternately false, unreliable and the work of “junior officers” in a joint news conference here on Saturday.
However, a senior Afghan minister later took a more aggrieved tone, suggesting that the leaked cables had irreparably damaged relations between the American ambassador, Karl W. Eikenberry, and members of the Afghan government. The minister, Omar Zakhilwal, also said that remarks attributed to him by Mr. Eikenberry in one of the cables, disparaging President Hamid Karzai, were false.

Until Saturday, the Afghan government had said little about the contents of the cables, thousands of confidential State Department memos that were made public in the past week by the Web site WikiLeaks and a number of newspapers. The Afghan president’s spokesman had said only that most of the major points had been previously disclosed and that Afghanistan and the United States had a strategic relationship.

Answering questions from the Afghan, Pakistani and international media at the news conference on Saturday, Mr. Karzai and the Pakistani prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, appeared to be at once trying to diminish the significance of the cables by throwing doubt on their authenticity while at the same time taking them seriously enough to deny some of their contents.

When Mr. Gilani was asked about a cable that said his government lacked the ability to control its own military and intelligence services, he said, “I would request you not to trust WikiLeaks.”

“These are just the views of junior officers,” he said. “They are not authentic. We should not even take them seriously.”

Mr. Karzai seemed at times statesmanlike and above the fray and at others frustrated, but overall he seemed more inclined to put the revelations behind him.

In response to questions, Mr. Karzai said that he understood that of course his ministers spoke about him, but that he was sure the way the cables characterized their remarks was not correct. “Take the example of Mr. Zakhilwal,” he said. “I am sure they are not true.”

Mr. Zakhilwal, the finance minister, was reported to have called Mr. Karzai “an extremely weak man,” comments he denied in his own news conference later on Saturday.

Mr. Karzai also said that people might say things casually in private that might not reflect their more considered and accurate positions. “People say things to other people not necessarily to be a part that they want to take home, and I understand some of the ministers may have been talking about me and some of them have done, I know, and other ministers in future may do the same,” he said, speaking in English. He added pointedly, “But we will not have a WikiLeaks to reveal that.”

He scorned the accuracy of another cable, about former Vice President Ahmed Zia Massoud’s taking $52 million in cash out of the country, saying that it was absurd to think that a vice president could arrive in another country with 30 suitcases full of cash. Furthermore, he said, the United States government had never spoken to him about it.

“The American government has been talking to us every day about corruption, every day they give us examples, every day they bring a case of $5,000, how come no report was given of this?” he said.

He continued: “We don’t know what to do with this whole thing: do we believe it or not believe it? I would go towards not believing it, that is better for Afghanistan.”

In his own news conference, Mr. Zakhilwal denied having uttered the remarks about Mr. Karzai as reported in a diplomatic cable sent by Mr. Eikenberry on Feb. 26, and suggested that the views were the ambassador’s.

“I have never, ever used this word ‘weak’ to describe the president, never, ever,” he said. “I have not said any kind of words like this regarding anyone.”

He said the accusations had destroyed any trust between him and the ambassador and would affect the ambassador’s effectiveness. “It has certainly hurt relations not only between me and him, but between some ministers and the ambassador, and it will certainly not be business as usual,” Mr. Zakhilwal said.

“The ambassador has used my name to support his views of the president,” he said. Asked if he was calling for the ambassador to resign, the minister replied, “It is up to the ambassador.”

Relations between Mr. Karzai and the American ambassador have been uneasy since the leaking of a secret diplomatic cable in November 2009 in which the ambassador said Mr. Karzai was “not a reliable partner” for the United States.

The American Embassy in Kabul sought Saturday to dampen the dispute. “We know there are many questions raised by these leaks, and we will work through those in private with our Afghan partners,” Caitlin Hayden, an embassy spokeswoman, said in a statement. “We are determined not to allow the reckless actions of WikiLeaks to harm the strong and strategic relationships we have built over many years with many members of the government of Afghanistan.”

Mr. Zakhilwal said he had offered his resignation to President Karzai, if there was any suspicion that the cables reflected his real views, but that the president had said he did not believe the cables and had asked him to stay on.

Mr. Zakhilwal is considered one of the ablest members of the Afghan cabinet and has proved a crucial representative for the country in negotiations with international donors and the Obama administration.

© Copyright (c) DTN News Defense-Technology News

  • Thursday, December 02, 2010

    DTN News - ANALYSIS By Goodspeed: Afghanistan — NATO’s Partner In War, Mistrust

    DTN News - ANALYSIS By Goodspeed: Afghanistan — NATO’s Partner In War, Mistrust
    Source: DTN News - - This article compiled by Roger Smith from reliable sources By Peter Goodspeed - National Post
    (NSI News Source Info) TORONTO, Canada - December 2, 2010: Canadian Ambassador William Crosbie’s leaked diplomatic cable highlights the extremely fragile relationship that exists between the government of Afghanistan and the NATO alliance.

    It is now obvious from Mr. Crosbie’s cable and the U.S. documents in the WikiLeaks trove that relations between Hamid Karzai, the Afghanistan president, and his foreign backers have become particularly poisonous.

    Relations on a long list of issues continue to deteriorate, including disputed elections, corruption, a banking scandal, as well as the political and security situation.

    The leaked Canadian memo is an independent confirmation of an earlier description of the corrupt and complex dynamics of the Afghan government made last year by Karl Eikenberry, the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan.

    The picture painted by Mr. Crosbie of an Afghanistan President on the verge of potentially quitting his alliance with NATO comes at a time when Canada has just made a commitment to stay in the country for another three years. Canadian military trainers will head to Afghanistan after combat troops withdraw next year.

    But as Mr. Crosbie reveals, despite NATO’s commitment to Afghanistan, relationships continue to worsen.

    “We have gone through numerous crises as an international community in our relations with the Karzai government,” Mr. Crosbie wrote to Ottawa. “Rather than strengthening ties they have served to exacerbate and weaken them.”

    Mr. Crosbie’s memo is not the first to highlight the disastrous relations with Mr. Karzai.

    Mr. Eikenberry is a veteran victim of leaked diplomatic documents that highlight the controversial dynamics of U.S. foreign policy.

    A year ago, when factions within the Obama administration were waging a fierce bureaucratic war over whether or not to send additional troops to Afghanistan, Mr. Eikenberry sent two cables to Washington arguing against the move.

    In one he warned his superiors that Mr. Karzai “is not an adequate strategic partner” and said the Afghan president “continues to shun responsibility for any sovereign burden, whether defence, governance or development.”

    In the other, Mr. Eikenberry cautioned against deploying sizable U.S. reinforcements, warning it would result in “astronomical costs” and would only deepen dependence of the Afghan government on the United States.

    The two cables were leaked within days of Mr. Eikenberry sending them to Washington.

    The leaks were an indication of one of the most bitter foreign policy battles being waged in the White House in decades.

    But they also bluntly outlined the fault lines of a faltering U.S. foreign policy in Afghanistan.

    Mr. Eikenberry, a retired U.S. Army Lieutenant General who once served as the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, has repeatedly cautioned against adopting a counterinsurgency strategy that assumed an Afghan political leadership that was secure, self-sufficient and capable.

    He has repeatedly depicted Mr. Karzai as being weak, out of touch and manipulative, more devoted to advancing his family and clan interests than in ruling well.

    The recent spate of WikiLeaks documents show not much has changed.

    One document talks of Mr. Karzai’s former vice-president, Zia Massoud, personally carrying $52-million in cash into Dubai last year. Others describe Mr. Karzai’s brother Ahmed Wali Karzai, as the “Godfather of Kandahar”.

    Still other reports discuss constant clashes between the U.S. Embassy and Mr. Karzai, such as when he released 150 dangerous detainees without trial and when he pardoned suspected drug dealers because they were linked to his political cronies.

    And that’s at a time when the Obama administration was making a concerted effort to get along with Mr. Karzai.

    The WikiLeaks documents portray Mr. Karzai as corrupt, duplicitous and paranoid. Canada’s diplomats apparently share those assessments.

    Meanwhile, disputes and protests over corruption allegations have meant that Afghanistan’s 249-seat parliament has been unable to meet since elections in September.

    Mr. Karzai has threatened to scrap the poll entirely, after the Independent Election Commission disqualified 24 early winners, who included some of the president’s supporters.

    Yet another scandal is brewing around the Kabul Bank, Afghanistan’s biggest privately owned bank, which, according to Mr. Crosbie’s cable is now expected to have losses ranging from US$500-million to US$850-million.

    The bank’s former chairman, a Karzai family friend, is said to have given more than US$150-million worth of villas and condominiums to members of the Afghan elite, including Mahmood Karzai, a brother of the president.

    In yet another controversial move, Mr. Karzai has set a December deadline for the dissolution of all private security firms in Afghanistan, in a bid to force NATO supply convoys to rely on Afghan government protection.

    The decision, however, will hurt international development firms that rely on private guards to protect workers building schools, roads and agricultural projects.

    Without adequate security many of those firms, which are responsible for more than US$2.5-billion in aid, say they will be forced to shut down.

    Hopes of a peaceful, negotiated settlement to problems and the rebuilding of Afghan institutions like the judiciary and security forces shattered by three decades of war grow fainter by the day.

    “With his legitimacy in question and his hold on power more tenuous by the day, Karzai now spends much of his time juggling the competing interests of his family, regional commanders, wealthy powerbrokers and international stakeholders,” the International Crisis Group said in a report, Afghanistan: Exit vs Engagement.

    “This precarious balancing act in which corruption and patronage reign supreme has neutralized the president’s potency and hindered government reform.”

    Norine MacDonald, president of policy research group the International Council on Security and Development (ICOS) added, “The international community has been very elastic about the process of democracy in Afghanistan, and it is a good question how far this can be stretched before the whole pretext snaps.”

    *This article is being posted from Toronto, Canada By DTN News ~ Defense-Technology News, contact: dtnnews@ymail.com
    © Copyright (c) DTN News Defense-Technology News