
Sunday, November 06, 2011
DTN News - AFGHAN WAR NEWS: Multiple Missteps Led To Drone Killing U.S. Troops In Afghanistan

Tuesday, November 01, 2011
DTN News: U.S. Department of Defense Contracts Dated November 1, 2011
CONTRACTS
MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY
The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) is announcing the award of an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with Raytheon Co., Integrated Defense Systems, of Woburn, Mass., under MDA contract HQ0147-12-D-0005. The total ceiling award value is $307,580,000. Under this new contract, the contractor will perform sustainment efforts to maintain software required to operate the X-band family of radars and BMDS test planning, execution and analysis. The work will be performed in Woburn, Mass. The ordering period is from Nov. 1, 2011 through Oct. 31, 2013. Fiscal year 2012 research, development, test and evaluation funds will be used to incrementally fund the initial orders. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. This is not a Foreign Military Sales acquisition. The MDA,Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, is the contracting activity.
ARMY
Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure Inc., Knoxville, Tenn., (W912QR-12-D-0001); Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group Inc., Pasadena, Calif., (W912QR-12-D-0002); URS Group Inc., Omaha, Neb., (W912QR-12-D-0003); Tetra Tech NUS Inc., Pittsburgh, Penn., (W912QR-12-D-0004); CH2M Hill Constructors Inc., Englewood, Colo., (W912QR-12-D-0005); PARS – Gannett Fleming JV, Robbinsville, N.J., (W912QR-12-D-0006); Bay West Inc., St. Paul, Minn., (W912QR-12-D-0007); Cape Environmental Management Inc., Norcross, Ga., (W912QR-12-D-0008); HydroGeoLogic Inc., Reston, Va., (W912QR-12-D-0009); Plexus Scientific Corp., Alexandria, Va., (W912QR-12-D-0010); and Earth Resources Technology Inc., Laurel, Md., (W912QR-12-D-0011); were awarded a $450,000,000 firm-fixed-price contract between 11 contractors. The award will provide for the environmental and restoration services for the Louisville District and all U.S. Army Corps of Engineers mission boundaries. Work location will be determined with each task order, with an estimated completion date of Oct. 27, 2021. The bid was solicited through the Internet, with 12 bids received. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville, Ky., is the contracting activity.
The Boeing Co., Mesa, Ariz., was awarded a $53,020,686 firm-fixed-price contract. The award will provide for the modification of an existing contract to support the AH-64D Apache. Work will be performed in Mesa, Ariz., with an estimated completion date of Feb. 28, 2014. One bid was solicited, with one bid received. The U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Ala., is the contracting activity (W58RGZ-09-C-0161).
The Boeing Co., Mesa, Ariz., was awarded a $29,853,554 firm-fixed-price contract. The award will provide for the modification of an existing contract to procure two AH-64D Apache War Replacement Aircraft. Work will be performed in Mesa, Ariz., with an estimated completion date of Oct. 31, 2013. One bid was solicited, with one bid received. The U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Ala., is the contracting activity (W58RGZ-05-C-0274).
Speegle Construction Inc., Niceville, Fla., was awarded a $24,645,000 firm-fixed-price contract. The award will provide for the construction of a Special Operation Forces Operation and Training Facility and an Unmanned Aerial Support Squad Operations Facility at Cannon Air Force Base, N.M. Work will be performed in Curry County, N.M., with an estimated completion date of Jan. 7, 2014. The bid was solicited through the Internet, with 19 bids received. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Albuquerque, N.M., is the contracting activity (W912PP-12-C-0003).
Lockheed Martin Corp., Grand Prairie, Texas, was awarded a $16,100,000 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract. The award will provide for the modification of an existing contract to procure the PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 missile segment enhancement follow-on flight tests. Work will be performed in Grand Prairie, Texas; Chelmsford, Mass.; Camden, Ark.; Huntsville, Ala.; Pinellas, Fla.; Vergennes, Vt.; Hollister, Calif.; Torrance, Calif.; and Wichita, Kan.; with an estimated completion date of Dec. 31, 2012. One bid was solicited, with one bid received. The U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Ala., is the contracting activity (W31P4Q-07-G-0001).
Computer Sciences Corp., – Defense, Falls Church, Va., was awarded a $14,658,512 time-and-materials contract. The award will provide for the systems engineering and technical assistance services in support of the Force Protection Systems. Work will be performed in Fort Belvoir, Va., and Fairfax County, Va., with an estimated completion date of Oct. 31, 2012. The bid was solicited through the Internet, with four bids received. The U.S. Army Contracting Command, Orlando, Fla., is the contracting activity (W91WAW-07-C-0080).
K.L. House Construction Co., Inc., Albuquerque, N.M., was awarded a $13,260,000 firm-fixed-price contract. The award will provide for the construction services on Cannon Air Force Base, N.M. Work will be performed in Curry County, N.M., with an estimated completion date of Feb. 12, 2013. The bid was solicited through the Internet, with 11 bids received. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Albuquerque, N.M., is the contracting activity (W912PP-12-C-0002).
A-T Solutions Inc., Fredericksburg, Va., was awarded a $9,851,037 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract. The award will provide for the modification of an existing contract to provide counter-improvised explosive device training programs in support of the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization. Work will be performed in Afghanistan, with an estimated completion date of Sept. 30, 2014. The bid was solicited through the Internet, with four bids received. The U.S. Army Contracting Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., is the contracting activity (W91CRB-09-C-0043).
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation, Herndon, Va., was awarded a $7,185,927 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract. The award will provide for the modification of an existing project to procure sense-and-warn capabilities in support of ongoing theater of operation efforts. Work will be performed in Bagram, Afghanistan; Baghdad, Iraq; and Huntsville, Ala.; with an estimated completion date of Nov. 30, 2011. One bid was solicited, with one bid was received. The U.S. Army Contracting Command, Redstone Arsenal, Ala., is the contracting activity (W31P4Q-11-C-0088).
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., Bethpage, N.Y. was awarded contract SPM4AX-12-D-9401. The award is a sole source, firm fixed price contract with a maximum $26,000,000 for airborne electronic attack spares and radio frequency switches. Other location of performance is Linthicum, Maryland. Using service is Navy. Type of appropriation is Navy Working Capital fund using FY 2012 – FY2014 funds. The date of performance completion is July 31, 2014. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Strategic Acquisitions at Philadelphia, Pa.
Bren-Tronics Inc., Commack, N.Y. * was awarded contract SPRBL1-12-D-0001. The award is a sole source, indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity, fixed price with economic price adjustment contract with a maximum $23,126,200 for CSEL battery and adapter for the AN/PRQ-7 CSEL radio. No other location of performance. Using service is Army. Type of appropriation is Army Working Capital fund using FY 2012 funds. The date of performance completion is November 1, 2016. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Land at Aberdeen, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md.
NAVY
General Dynamics Bath Iron Works, Bath, Maine is being awarded a $14,392,031 modification to previously awarded contract (N00024-06-C-2303) exercising options for DDG 1000-class services and class logistics services. This contract modification provides additional class services associated with the detail design and construction of DDG 1000-class ships. This work will provide technical and industrial engineering in the interpretation and application of the detail design to support construction and the maintenance of the ship design. The class logistics effort is for the continued development of DDG 1000-class integrated logistics support which includes development of training curriculum, supply support documentation, maintenance analyses, and configuration status accounting. Work will be performed in Bath, Maine, and is expected to be completed by November 2012. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Naval Sea Systems Command, Washington, D.C., is the contracting activity.
URS-IAP, LLC, Austin, Texas, is being awarded a $6,858,080 cost-plus-award-fee modification to increase the maximum dollar value of task order #0008 under a previously awarded multiple award construction contract (N62470-06-D-6009) for the design and construction of a dining facility, network infrastructure improvements, water production facility, fuel farm, western taxiway, and full length taxiway, at Camp Lemonnier, Djibouti. After award of this modification, the total cumulative task order value will be $74,158,298. Work will be performed in Djibouti, Africa, and is expected to be completed by June 2012. Contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Europe Africa Southwest Asia, Naples, Italy, is the contracting activity.
AIR FORCE
Advanced Federal Services Corp., Madison, Ala., is being awarded a $10,602,369 cost-plus-award-fee contract to provide civil engineering support on the Base Operations Service Support (BOSS) contract. The primary location of performance is Fort Eustis, Va. 633rd Contracting Squadron (CONS), Langley Air Force Base, Va., is the contracting activity (W911S0-08-C-0001 Option Year 4).
*Small Business
©COPYRIGHT (C) DTN NEWS DEFENSE-TECHNOLOGY NEWS
©COPYRIGHT (C) DTN NEWS DEFENSE-TECHNOLOGY NEWS
©COPYRIGHT (C) DTN NEWS DEFENSE-TECHNOLOGY NEWS
COPYRIGHT (C) DTN NEWS DEFENSE-TECHNOLOGY NEWS
COPYRIGHT (C) DTN NEWS DEFENSE-TECHNOLOGY NEWS
COPYRIGHT (C) DTN NEWS DEFENSE-TECHNOLOGY NEWS
Monday, October 31, 2011
DTN News - ASIAN BOOMING ECONOMIES: The Web Of New Alignments In Asia

(NSI News Source Info) NEW DELHI, India - October 31, 2011: On October 4, Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai winged out of the darkness louring over
his country to land in India for a two-day visit. A week later, India hosted the Vietnamese President, Truong Tan Sang, and his Myanmarese counterpart Thein Sein in succession. In case you are wondering what prompted the heads of state of these three countries—not occupying much mindspace of ordinary Indians—to come calling on New Delhi, a rebalancing of regional power equations has escaped your notice. In a nutshell, key countries across Asia are currently engaged in the business of forging new alliances. Three crucial factors seem to have sparked off the diplomatic realignment. To begin with, Asia is home to some of the fastest growing economies of the world, and holds out hope of rejuvenating a global economy so palpably destitute of any vim. Yet, ironically, Asia is also the battleground where some of the bloodiest conflicts of the world are being fought. The third factor is the rise of China— economically galloping, occasionally flexing its muscles and generating consternation across the continent.
In this ongoing realignment, India has emerged as a player, a surety of sorts against the vagaries of the future. What has enabled India to carve a niche of its own is its impressive growth over the last 10 years, its inclusive democracy, its growing military might, and the faith the US has reposed in New Delhi’s ability to play a global role. As former ministry of external affairs secretary N. Ravi told Outlook, “It’s not only the familiarity and trust that all these countries have with India but also the fact that our development and growth provides a framework for many of them to use as a model.”
Hamid Karzai’s recent visit best illustrates the vantage position India occupies. With Pakistan-controlled terror groups killing top Afghan leaders and the atmosphere of acrimony enveloping US-Pak relations, a rattled Karzai signed a strategic partnership agreement with India. It was perceived as an attempt to register growing frustration with Islamabad’s reluctance to act against terror groups operating from Pakistani soil against the Karzai regime. It was Karzai’s way of telling Pakistan that it had better accede to his wishes or else run the risk of seeing India emerge as a major player in Afghanistan. To put it mildly, this is anathema to Pakistan, with its cult of ‘strategic depth’, which demands a friendly neighbour in the west so that it can focus on its eastern border with India.
Srinath Raghavan of the Centre for Policy Research provides another reason: “Unlike others, India worked on a stand-alone basis in Afghanistan by talking to the Afghans directly and not through the US or others. Through the agreement, Karzai has recognised India as a long-term and reliable partner.”
If Afghanistan and India have come closer, then so have China and Pakistan. What has prompted Islamabad to seek Beijing as never before is Washington’s refusal to accept Pakistan as the sole arbiter of Afghanistan’s future. Frustrated and angry, Pakistan has been talking tough with the US. Some in the Indian foreign policy establishment feel Pakistan’s bold stance has been at China’s behest. Others, however, feel this could be China’s method of merely testing America’s resolve. Their argument: it isn’t in Beijing’s interest to allow the Pak-US problems to fester beyond a point. It, therefore, might soon ask Pakistan to back off. Their reason? Instability and violence in Afghanistan could spill over into China and impact its growth. Nor would China want to substitute the Americans—and consequently commit its resources—in bolstering Pakistan’s creaking economy. In this game of bluff and bluster, Karzai sees in India an important card to play against Pakistan.
|
But the emerging tapestry of alliances demands that countries strike a fine balance among contending powers. It does not mean a “zero sum game”—gains for one country and losses for another. So even as Sang was in India, Vietnam thought it prudent to send the general secretary of its ruling Communist Party to Beijing to engage with leaders there.
The quest to cultivate India saw Myanmarese President Thein Sein land in New Delhi a day after Sang’s departure. From the time Sein was elected president early this year, he has taken some momentous decisions—from releasing dissident leader Aung San Suu Kyi to granting greater freedom of operation to opposition parties. Perhaps the most surprising of his decisions was to stop work on the $3.6-billion, Chinese financed Myitsone hydro-electric power project recently. Over the past years, Myanmar has been reaching out to India to nurture options other than China, which enjoys a predominant influence over the leadership there. Again, Myanmar too sent its vice-president to Beijing to explain to its leadership why it has suspended work on the Myitsone project.
Is the inclination of these countries to woo India and yet not alienate China confusing? Raghavan provides the answer: “All the smaller neighbours are expanding their options so that they don’t end up being dominated by any single country. (But) the visit of the three presidents demonstrates that more countries in Asia are now keen to see India play a bigger role in the region, much beyond South Asia.” This strategy suits the Indian foreign policy establishment, which too believes that a growing web of engagement is the best answer to prevent a single power from dominating the region.

