Sunday, December 05, 2010

DTN News - AFRICA: Is Ivory Coast Heading For Internal Armed Conflict

DTN News - AFRICA: Is Ivory Coast Heading For Internal Armed Conflict
**Ivory Coast's Gbagbo sworn in despite poll row
Source: DTN News - - This article compiled by Roger Smith from reliable sources including Rueters
(NSI News Source Info) TORONTO, Canada - December 5, 2010: Laurent Gbagbo was sworn in as Ivory Coast's president on Saturday after his election victory was rejected by world leaders but accepted by the army, raising fears of a power struggle.

The election commission said Alassane Ouattara had won the November 28 poll with 54.1 percent but the top legal body, citing alleged intimidation, scrapped hundreds of thousands of votes on Friday and handed victory to Gbagbo.

Gbagbo's swearing in was broadcast live on state television, and comes after the head of the West African country's army declared his continued allegiance to Gbagbo late on Friday.

Ouattara has also been backed in his rejection of Gbagbo's re-election by rebels still running the north after a 2002-03 civil war, and Prime Minister Guillaume Soro, a former rebel himself, who said he would resign.

"I will continue to work with all the countries of the world, but I will never give up our sovereignty," Gbagbo said to cheers and the sound of vuvuzelas after being sworn in.

Residents of the main city Abidjan reported gunfire in several districts overnight and heard heavy weapons fire in Port Bouet, near the airport, but could not say who was involved.

Protests and tyre-burning broke out on Saturday in several towns, including Abidjan and in the northern town of Bouake, but none were on a large scale.

"We want (Ouattara) as president. We don't want Gbagbo anymore. We are tired of him," said Bouake resident Samba Diakite.

The African Union said it would send former South African President Thabo Mbeki to try to seek a solution to the crisis.

World leaders, including U.S. President Barack Obama, the head of the United Nations and West African regional body ECOWAS said Ouattara was the clear winner of a poll meant to heal wounds after a decade of division.

Gbagbo critics have pointed out that Paul Yao N'dre, president of the Constitutional Council which reversed the poll result, is a staunch Gbagbo ally, and Ouattara's party has warned denying him victory would risk throwing the country back into north-south conflict.

But Gbagbo's camp has rejected outside pressure, threatening to throw the U.N.'s top envoy out of the country.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy called Ouattara's win "incontestable". Such comments are likely to play into the hands of Gbagbo, a master at whipping up anti-French sentiment and who accuses the former colonial ruler of backing Ouattara.

The hotly contested run-off was due to cap the protracted process of reunifying a country that was once West Africa's brightest economic prospect.

Ivory Coast is the world's top cocoa grower and cocoa futures closed up 2.41 percent to 1,955 pounds on Friday and Ivory Coast's $2.3 Eurobond yielded 11.67 percent, from below 10 percent after round one.

Test of resolve

A peaceful first round gave way to a divisive second round, with Ouattara winning most of the north but Gbagbo saying provisional results there were marred by rebel-led intimidation. The rebels deny the charge. Ouattara says international backing shows he is the rightful president.

At least 15 people have been killed in election-related violence in the last 10 days but there are fears of more. Rebel forces said they were on high alert for a government attack.

Donors, led by the United Nations which was to certify results under a 2007 peace deal, spent $400 million on the poll.

Election observers said intimidation marred voting in rebel and government territory but said overall the vote was fair.

The U.N. envoy, who received copies of the count from almost every polling station, said even if all the allegations of fraud were true, they would still not have changed the result.

In what diplomats said was an unusually strong endorsement, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon congratulated Ouattara on his win and called on Gbagbo to cooperate in the transition.

The regional body ECOWAS, led by economic powerhouse Nigeria, also supported Ouattara's victory. But diplomats in New York said Russia, whose Lukoil has an exploration block in Ivory Coast, had blocked the U.N. Security Council from also doing so.

The lack of Security Council consensus on the U.N. position could encourage Gbagbo to ignore outside pressure.

*This article is being posted from Toronto, Canada By DTN News ~ Defense-Technology News, contact: dtnnews@ymail.com

© Copyright (c) DTN News Defense-Technology News

  • Saturday, December 04, 2010

    DTN News - BREAKING NEWS: Afghans And Pakistanis Attack Cables - WikiLeaks

    DTN News - BREAKING NEWS: Afghans And Pakistanis Attack Cables - WikiLeaks
    Source: DTN News - - This article compiled by Roger Smith from reliable sources By ALISSA J. RUBIN and CARLOTTA GALL - NYTimes.com
    (NSI News Source Info) KABUL, Afghanistan - December 5, 2010: The Afghan president and the Pakistani prime minister dismissed the WikiLeaks revelations about their respective countries as alternately false, unreliable and the work of “junior officers” in a joint news conference here on Saturday.
    However, a senior Afghan minister later took a more aggrieved tone, suggesting that the leaked cables had irreparably damaged relations between the American ambassador, Karl W. Eikenberry, and members of the Afghan government. The minister, Omar Zakhilwal, also said that remarks attributed to him by Mr. Eikenberry in one of the cables, disparaging President Hamid Karzai, were false.

    Until Saturday, the Afghan government had said little about the contents of the cables, thousands of confidential State Department memos that were made public in the past week by the Web site WikiLeaks and a number of newspapers. The Afghan president’s spokesman had said only that most of the major points had been previously disclosed and that Afghanistan and the United States had a strategic relationship.

    Answering questions from the Afghan, Pakistani and international media at the news conference on Saturday, Mr. Karzai and the Pakistani prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, appeared to be at once trying to diminish the significance of the cables by throwing doubt on their authenticity while at the same time taking them seriously enough to deny some of their contents.

    When Mr. Gilani was asked about a cable that said his government lacked the ability to control its own military and intelligence services, he said, “I would request you not to trust WikiLeaks.”

    “These are just the views of junior officers,” he said. “They are not authentic. We should not even take them seriously.”

    Mr. Karzai seemed at times statesmanlike and above the fray and at others frustrated, but overall he seemed more inclined to put the revelations behind him.

    In response to questions, Mr. Karzai said that he understood that of course his ministers spoke about him, but that he was sure the way the cables characterized their remarks was not correct. “Take the example of Mr. Zakhilwal,” he said. “I am sure they are not true.”

    Mr. Zakhilwal, the finance minister, was reported to have called Mr. Karzai “an extremely weak man,” comments he denied in his own news conference later on Saturday.

    Mr. Karzai also said that people might say things casually in private that might not reflect their more considered and accurate positions. “People say things to other people not necessarily to be a part that they want to take home, and I understand some of the ministers may have been talking about me and some of them have done, I know, and other ministers in future may do the same,” he said, speaking in English. He added pointedly, “But we will not have a WikiLeaks to reveal that.”

    He scorned the accuracy of another cable, about former Vice President Ahmed Zia Massoud’s taking $52 million in cash out of the country, saying that it was absurd to think that a vice president could arrive in another country with 30 suitcases full of cash. Furthermore, he said, the United States government had never spoken to him about it.

    “The American government has been talking to us every day about corruption, every day they give us examples, every day they bring a case of $5,000, how come no report was given of this?” he said.

    He continued: “We don’t know what to do with this whole thing: do we believe it or not believe it? I would go towards not believing it, that is better for Afghanistan.”

    In his own news conference, Mr. Zakhilwal denied having uttered the remarks about Mr. Karzai as reported in a diplomatic cable sent by Mr. Eikenberry on Feb. 26, and suggested that the views were the ambassador’s.

    “I have never, ever used this word ‘weak’ to describe the president, never, ever,” he said. “I have not said any kind of words like this regarding anyone.”

    He said the accusations had destroyed any trust between him and the ambassador and would affect the ambassador’s effectiveness. “It has certainly hurt relations not only between me and him, but between some ministers and the ambassador, and it will certainly not be business as usual,” Mr. Zakhilwal said.

    “The ambassador has used my name to support his views of the president,” he said. Asked if he was calling for the ambassador to resign, the minister replied, “It is up to the ambassador.”

    Relations between Mr. Karzai and the American ambassador have been uneasy since the leaking of a secret diplomatic cable in November 2009 in which the ambassador said Mr. Karzai was “not a reliable partner” for the United States.

    The American Embassy in Kabul sought Saturday to dampen the dispute. “We know there are many questions raised by these leaks, and we will work through those in private with our Afghan partners,” Caitlin Hayden, an embassy spokeswoman, said in a statement. “We are determined not to allow the reckless actions of WikiLeaks to harm the strong and strategic relationships we have built over many years with many members of the government of Afghanistan.”

    Mr. Zakhilwal said he had offered his resignation to President Karzai, if there was any suspicion that the cables reflected his real views, but that the president had said he did not believe the cables and had asked him to stay on.

    Mr. Zakhilwal is considered one of the ablest members of the Afghan cabinet and has proved a crucial representative for the country in negotiations with international donors and the Obama administration.

    © Copyright (c) DTN News Defense-Technology News

    •